EmpireStateBuildingInvestors .com     Toll Free 866-574-1712
  • Home
  • Page List
  • SEC-Malkin Letter
  • Contact
  • ESB Ownership
    • Questions about sales process and 50% split with sublessee. 4
    • Empire State Building and Sublessee 1961-2012: Changing views
    • $2.5 Billion Empire State Building Appraisal 6
    • Sublease >
      • "The supervisor has represented that historically, agreements have been entered into to share capital expenditure and financing costs"
      • Sublessee owners 7
      • Sublessee or Lessee 8
      • Is sublessee in a joint venture with Empire State Building? 9 empire state building ipo prospectus
      • Sublessee declines opportunity to become co-owner 10
      • Owner's relationship with sublessee is contractual 12
    • There is one owner of Empire State Building 11
    • Title to all of the improvements shall be in the Lessor 13
  • News
  • Lawsuits against Malkin Holdings L.L.C. since 3/1/12
    • 3/1/2012 First Class Action Lawsuit
    • 3/7/12 Second Class Action Suit
    • 3/12/12 Third Class Action Suit
  • SEC Rules
    • SEC rules
    • SEC rules 2
  • 3/16/12 SEC filing Empire State Building Associates
  • 4/4/12 SEC Filing EMPIRE STATE BUILDING ASSOCIATES L.L.C.
  • May 31 2012 Empire State Building Associates L.L.C. SEC Filing
  • How much is your ownership worth?
  • WSJ: High-Stakes Feud over Empire State Building
  • FORM OF PARTICIPATING AGREEMENT OF EMPIRE STATE BUILDING ASSOCIATES L.L.C.
  • No independent representative was retained to negotiate on behalf of the participants
  • S-4 Empire State Equity Trust February 13, 2012 14
  • definitions
  • continued from home page 15
  • Empire State Owners Go Ape Over IPO Tax Issues: Wall Street Journal April 8 2012
  • January 9, 2012 Answer to SEC inquiry
  • REITs Spring an Unnerving Surprise
  • Average Rent paid according to Malkin Holdings L.L.C.
  • Duties of Supervisor of Associates
  • Reuters: Empire State Building IPO change may help pay tax
  • Wall Street Journal: Tax Terms Amended in Empire State Building IPO
  • How to Ruin a Safe Bet; Did Rockefeller Center Financiers Reach Too Far?
  • May 31 2012 Helmsley Estate Driving Empire State Building IPO, Malkins Say
  • SEC May 11, 2012 :" "There are material risks and conflicts of interest associated with the consolidation."
  • Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. Lockup Agreement
  • Sublease or Lease
  • Shared Debt Obligation
  • Eliminating Two-Tier Ownership
  • Sublease renewals
  • June 9, 2008 Consent for Loan for Improvement Program
  • December 27, 1961 Lease Empire State Building Prudential Insurance Company and Empire State Building Associates
  • Lease renewals
  • June 8 2008 Loan for Improvements
  • June 9, 2008 Empire State Building Improvements Budget
  • $10 million REIT fees paid out 2011 Empire State Building IPO
  • 2011 Empire State Building Company LLC financials
  • SEC filing July 2, 2012 Empire State Building Associates L.L.C
  • ESBA number of participants
  • On August 6, 2012, Malkin Holdings L.L.C., the supervisor of Empire State Building Associates L.L.C. (the “Registrant”), provided the following to persons calling participants in the Registrant, to be used as a script for such calls:
  • SEC August 6, 2012 Empire State Realty Trust, Inc
  • Poll of ESBA participants
  • August 9, 2012 Legal Proceedings Empire State Building Associates 10Q
  • Columbia University Sublesse interest
  • August 9, 2012 SEC filing of New Risk Factor of More Lawsuits against Management
  • 2012: Observatory increased admission prices over 15%
  • Wells Notice
  • SEC Filing 8/24/12 "legally distinct from a joint venture"‏ malkin empire state sec filings
  • Empire State Realty Trust Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. Empire State Building IPO
  • Top ten reasons to Vote NO to sale of Empire State Building to REIT
  • Empire State Building Income
  • Page 1
  • Economic Joint Venture
  • 50/50 split
  • Empire State Building privately owned by Empire State Building Company?
  • S-4
  • 11/5/12 Settlement reached in Empire State Realty Trust suit
  • S-4 Red-lined version 11/2/12
  • Class Action Suit
  • Empire State Building Company Partnership Agreement
  • January 28, 2013 $800 Class Action Lawsuit Filed
  • REIT fees to ESBA investors
  • 1971 Sublessee Operating Agreement and Amendments
  • 1971 Empire State Building Company Participation Agreement
  • SEC 2/5/13 1971 Sublessee Empire State Building Company Participation Agreement
  • Top Ten Vote No
  • Sublease and improvements
  • Ex-Wien partner: Vote No to REIT
  • NYC's Towering TV Choice: 1 WTC Or Empire
  • Observatory
  • 1961 Empire State Building Associates Prospectus
  • A Yen for Yield Could Rock U.S. REIT
  • Law360
  • REfin Blog
  • Crain's New York: Bidders up ante at Empire State Bldg.
  • Crains New York: Another bidder moves to upset Empire St. Bldg. plan.
  • ESBA purchase of fee title 2001-2
  • Damage and Destruction:
  • ESBA land building cost percentages
  • Revman headed for Empire State Building
  • SL Green says private market will value ESB higher
  • Private market values exceed public market values
  • Thor makes second offer for Empire State Building
  • Empire State Building Investors Again Sue Owners Over IPO
  • Empire State Building Topless Model Lawsuit
  • Empire State Building $500 Million Lawsuit against Malkin Holdings
  • Investors Launch $600M Suit Over Empire State Building Deal
  • Law360: Report Details Malkin's Rebuff Of Empire State Bldg. Bids‏
  • Empire State Building Investor Appeals $55M Settlement
  • Empire State Building Investors Rip Owners Over Discovery
  • SEC Freedom of Information Act Exemptions
  • ESRT SEC filings comments and Malkin Holdings uploaded answers
  • ESRT SEC Indexed files
  • FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2013 (October 1, 2012 through September 30, 2013)
  • Freedom of Information Appeal (FOIA) Resources
  • “MALKIN FAMILY CONTRIBUTORS” to REIT
  • FOIA Vaughn Index
  • sec-glomar-response-to-foia-request-for-copies-of-interviews-with-empire-state-building-investors
  • “[WE] CAN NEITHER CONFIRM NOR DENY THE EXISTENCE OR NONEXISTENCE OF RECORDS RESPONSIVE TO YOUR REQUEST”1 : REFORMING THE GLOMAR RESPONSE UNDER FOIA
  • SEC issues Glomar Response for ESRT-first since 2010
  • Glomar Response-Office of Government Information Services
  • Empire State Building $600 Million lawsuit against Peter Malkin and Tony Malkin
  • SEC FOIA Lawsuit for Empire State Building REIT records
  • Case 1:14-cv-01140 EDELMAN v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Complaint
  • AGREEMENT BETWEEN MALKIN HOLDINGS LLC AND HELMSLEY ENTERPRISES, INC.
  • PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS and FORM OF PARTICIPATING AGREEMENT For Lincoln and Fish Buildings
  • Helmsley Management to self manage
  • SEC Division of Corporation Finance Staff Legal Bulletin No. 1 (with Addendum) "Confidential Treatment Requests"
  • Untitled
  • EDELMAN v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION-Case Assigned to Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. (md, )
  • About 20% of the people who were warned over a two-year period that they might be sued by U.S. regulators for allegedly violating securities law ended up not facing charges
  • justice.gov guide-freedom-information-act
  • September 19, 2013
  • September 5, 2013
  • August 12, 2013
  • December 21, 2012
  • December 17, 2012
  • October 19, 2012
  • October 10, 2012
  • October 5, 2012
  • September 24, 2012
  • September 13, 2012 file 1
  • September 13, 2012 file 2
  • September 10, 2012 file 1
  • September 10, 2012 file 2
  • September 5, 2012
  • August 27, 2012
  • May 8 , 2012
  • July 3, 2012
  • The OGIS Library Vaughn Index
  • FOIA Facts: Inside the Process of Preparing a Vaughn Index
  • Sample Vaughn Indexes
  • ESRT Equity Interests
  • SEC Vaughn Index Lawsuits
  • Gavin vs. SEC
  • GAVIN v. UNITED STATES SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMM., Civil No. 04-4522 (PAM/JSM). , at 4 (D. Minn. Oct. 13, 2006)
  • Empire State Realty Trust Ownership
  • Improvements ownership
  • Therefore, each of Associates and Lessee will ultimately bear one-half of the cost of the improvement program
  • CF Memo
  • SEC Is Steering More Trials to Judges It Appoints
  • 10/20/14 Activity in Case 1:14-cv-01140-RMC EDELMAN v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Order
  • NYC Rooftop RF Options Widen
  • H.R.1211 - FOIA Act
  • Exemption 5
  • Exemption 6
  • 11/10/14 ESRT Update on Lawsuits
  • SEC: How Investigations Work
  • SEC FOIA Exclusions
  • SEC FOIA Requests November 2014
  • FOIA Glomar response conversion to The (c)(1) Exclusion
  • Law360: Empire State Building Investors Launch Another Suit Over IPO
  • 2/17/15: PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  • ESB SEC FOIA Requests Updated List
  • ESB SEC FOIA Requests Updated List March 2015
  • 04/17/15 RICHARD EDELMAN, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:14-CV-1140 (RDM) ) SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ) COMMISSION, ) Defendant.
  • Malkin attorneys FOIA requests for ESB investigation files rebuffed by SEC
  • ESRT SEC Enforcement Investigation File
  • FOIA Lawsuit San Diego
  • Malkin Holdings lawyers Dewey Pegno SEC FOIA requests Empire State Building
  • Federal Court to Rule on release of SEC ESRT-Malkin Holdings Investigation Files
  • Peter Malkin Tony Malkin Lose Empire State Building Case Ruling
  • Malkin Holdings, Peter Malkin and Tony Malkin lose counterclaim ruling in Empire State Building Arbitration case.
  • Federal Court to rule on release of SEC ESRT Malkin Holdings ​Empire State Building investigation files.
  • SEC FOIA Lawsuit Empire State Realty Trust Malkin Holdings Consumer Complaints
  • Empire State Realty Trust Income Tax Treatment according to Malkin Holdings LLC
  • February 20, 2013 Re: In re Empire State Realty Trust, MNY-08894
  • SEC 662
  • SEC lawyers Empire State Building sale notes from calls and meetings with Malkin Holdings managers ordered released by Federal Judge
  • Malkin answer to SEC about unauthorized renewal of Empire State Building Master Lease
  • "SEC Ordered To Turn Over Empire State REIT Docs Index"
  • Empire State Building Department of Justice FOIA ruling Malkin Holdings

Will be called Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. The website address is www.empirestaterealtytrust.com 


http://sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/32776/000119312512338073/d390007ddefa14a.htm 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A

(Rule 14a-101)

INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT

SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION

Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the

Securities Exchange Act of 1934

(Amendment No.    )

Filed by the Registrant  x                            Filed by a Party other than the Registrant  ¨

Check the appropriate box:

¨ Preliminary Proxy Statement¨ Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule14a-6(e)(2))¨ Definitive Proxy Statement¨ Definitive Additional Materialsx Soliciting Material Under Rule 14a-12
EMPIRE STATE BUILDING ASSOCIATES L.L.C.
(Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)(Name of Persons(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if Other Than the Registrant)Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):x No fee required.¨ Fee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and 0-11. (1) Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:

   (2) Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:

   (3) Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):

   (4) Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:

   (5) Total fee paid:    ¨ Fee paid previously with preliminary materials:¨ Check box if any part of the fee is offset as provided by Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the form or schedule and the date of its filing. (1) Amount previously paid:

   (2) Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

   (3) Filing Party:

   (4) Date Filed:

  

On August 6, 2012, Malkin Holdings L.L.C., the supervisor of Empire State Building Associates L.L.C. (the “Registrant”), provided the following to persons calling participants in the Registrant, to be used as a script for such calls:

LEGACY TEL OUTREACH – CALL SCRIPT

 • I am calling from Malkin Holdings regarding the proposed consolidation of various office and retail properties into a publicly traded real estate investment trust, known as a REIT. The new entity will be called Empire State Realty Trust, Inc.

 • We have sent you several letters about the consolidation and will be continuing to make outreach to our investors. We thought it might be helpful if we called you directly to answer any questions you may have about any of our letters, the proposed transaction, or anything else you might have on your mind.

 • Is now a good time to for you? If not, would you like to schedule a time for me or someone else from the organization to call you back?

 • Thank you for taking the time to speak with us. First off, may I ask you if you have received our letters? If so, did you find them helpful? Is there anything about which you have a question which you would like addressed or explained in greater detail?

 • First and foremost, Malkin Holdings believes that the consolidation gives investors greater potential for increased distributions and increased value from capital appreciation than they would have by remaining a participant in any of the subject LLCs. This belief is based on the anticipated growth in the revenues of the initial properties operated as a portfolio under the Malkin brand and potential additional investments by the REIT.

 • I would like to confirm that you are aware that you will now have the option to defer tax that would be triggered by the proposed consolidation. We want to make sure you know that this tax deferral treatment is well established and is not contingent upon obtaining any IRS or SEC ruling. Do you have any question about the three different options?

 • If questions:

 • ESBA investors will have the option to elect either taxable Class A Shares or tax-deferred operating partnership units – known as OP Units. We plan to list the Class A Shares and OP Units on the NYSE or another national securities exchange.

 • While these OP Units don’t have voting rights, if you elect to receive OP Units, you may also choose to elect a portion in Class B Shares which provide voting rights equivalent to Class A Shares in the REIT with minimal tax effect. The Malkin family has elected to receive OP Units and Class B Shares, as well as a small portion of Class A Shares, in exchange for their interests in your entity. Investors will now be able to avail themselves of the same equity structure and tax treatment as the Malkin family and the private entities.

 • Do you have more questions about this new structure? (If so, all answers to come directly from the July 2nd letter and S-4 or to be referred to another “expert” for another follow-up call).



 • We understand that change can be disconcerting and that many of you may be content with your current investment as is. But there are many developments from which we think you will benefit in the proposed transaction, and I would like to share some of them with you now.

 • We believe that an excellent opportunity for all investors is to pursue the consolidation and IPO for reasons laid out in the draft Form S-4 filed with the SEC and, in addition to greater potential for upside and capital appreciation, I will touch on the highlights here.

 • This transaction is expected to result in regular quarterly dividends which must be at least of 90% of REIT taxable income. The source of distributions will be the consolidated results of a portfolio of properties, rather than being dependent on just one property.

 • Next, this path will result in coordinated planning and decision-making and improved accountability from a board of directors consisting predominantly of independent directors that is responsible for overseeing the operations of the REIT.

 • And perhaps most importantly, it will also provide liquidity that investors currently lack. Should you need to sell all or part of your ownership interest for any reason, we expect that there will be a public market to facilitate an efficient sale and that it will permit much higher value to be realized by a selling investor than has been achieved from sales of participation interests in the limited market that has been available historically.

 • As you likely know, Malkin Holdings supervises buildings throughout the greater New York metropolitan area, in and out of Manhattan. The properties that will be acquired by the REIT have their own unique attributes and significant growth opportunities. Many of them are award-winning in their own right. The properties, as a whole, have an excellent and growing collection of top quality tenants, with similar credit to the new tenants who are leasing space at the Empire State Building. And all are located in locations near important transportation hubs and Manhattan or growing business communities in the New York metropolitan area such as White Plains and Stamford.

 • While the Empire State Building is the most well-known, it is only one property, and all the properties are valuable. The other properties, as a whole, show potential for upside.

 • [One thing that is very important for Empire State Building Associates is the fact is, the status quo cannot continue. Under Leona Helmsley’s will, her executors must sell all interests in her estate which represent more than a 1% ownership interest in any corporation, partnership or other business entity. Her estate’s interests include an interest in the operating lease of the Empire State Building which shares a veto with the Malkin family of all decisions by the operating lessee of the Empire State Building. Thus, a sale by the estate to an unknown third party carries real risk to investors, because such party would have the power to significantly influence and control operations and, as a result, distributions to investors.

 • [Institutional investors make up the vast majority of purchasers of REIT shares. Something for which REIT investors look is dedicated management. Therefore, it makes sense to include in the proposed REIT all of the Manhattan and New York City market properties supervised by Malkin Holdings. This way, REIT management cannot be accused of favoring a non-REIT property over a REIT owned property.] But under the structure being proposed now, all of these properties will be under consolidated so that a benefit to one property benefits all.



 • Do you have any specific questions about why we are recommending this transaction? (If so, all answers to come directly from pages 27-30 of draft S-4).

 • [We know that there is a lot of information contained in our filings and our letters. For that reason, we have launched a website which contains the publicly available materials on this transaction that we have filed thus far. It also contains information about the properties being consolidated. The website address is www.empirestaterealtytrust.com]

 • [We will continually update our website so you should consider it a resource. Once the Form S-4 is declared effective by the SEC, we will add even more content to the website including videos and instructions on how to vote.]

 • FOR ESBA ONLY:

 • We also want to take a moment to ask you if you have any question or comment about any outreach you may have received from individuals who are opposing this transaction. We have been following their comments and questions they have raised about our proposed transaction. Under securities laws, we were required to provide your address to these investors. We have received reports of statements made on these calls and have heard many of these calls ourselves. We believe that those individuals are creating an environment of confusion through incorrect statements about ESBA and our proposed transaction. We suggest that you rely on our letters and SEC filings (i.e., the Form S-4) for facts and conclusions about this transaction, rather than on these individuals’ conclusions. From our direct experience, we believe one cannot rely on the accuracy of their conclusions.

 • We encourage you to rely on information that Malkin Holdings has publicly filed with SEC rather than on speculative and unsupported comments. We also welcome any comment or question from any investor at any time.

 • We also want to talk to you a bit about the process and what you can expect in the coming months.

 • As we have explained in several of our letters, you need not do anything immediately. No action whatsoever is required of you at this time. In order for us to solicit your vote, the SEC must declare our Form S-4 effective. We expect that is still a few months away.

 • At that time, we will be mailing you the final document and consent solicitation and you will then have at least 60 days after such mailing to review the filing, ask additional questions if you have them, and speak to your personal advisors if desired before you need to vote.

 • Now that I have touched on some of the current topics, I want to ask you if any specific questions about the consolidation proposal or if any of what you have read or heard is of concern to you?

 • I will do my best to answer your questions, or I will arrange for someone to follow up with you if I cannot answer any question myself.