EmpireStateBuildingInvestors .com     Toll Free 866-574-1712
  • Home
  • Page List
  • SEC-Malkin Letter
  • Contact
  • ESB Ownership
    • Questions about sales process and 50% split with sublessee. 4
    • Empire State Building and Sublessee 1961-2012: Changing views
    • $2.5 Billion Empire State Building Appraisal 6
    • Sublease >
      • "The supervisor has represented that historically, agreements have been entered into to share capital expenditure and financing costs"
      • Sublessee owners 7
      • Sublessee or Lessee 8
      • Is sublessee in a joint venture with Empire State Building? 9 empire state building ipo prospectus
      • Sublessee declines opportunity to become co-owner 10
      • Owner's relationship with sublessee is contractual 12
    • There is one owner of Empire State Building 11
    • Title to all of the improvements shall be in the Lessor 13
  • News
  • Lawsuits against Malkin Holdings L.L.C. since 3/1/12
    • 3/1/2012 First Class Action Lawsuit
    • 3/7/12 Second Class Action Suit
    • 3/12/12 Third Class Action Suit
  • SEC Rules
    • SEC rules
    • SEC rules 2
  • 3/16/12 SEC filing Empire State Building Associates
  • 4/4/12 SEC Filing EMPIRE STATE BUILDING ASSOCIATES L.L.C.
  • May 31 2012 Empire State Building Associates L.L.C. SEC Filing
  • How much is your ownership worth?
  • WSJ: High-Stakes Feud over Empire State Building
  • FORM OF PARTICIPATING AGREEMENT OF EMPIRE STATE BUILDING ASSOCIATES L.L.C.
  • No independent representative was retained to negotiate on behalf of the participants
  • S-4 Empire State Equity Trust February 13, 2012 14
  • definitions
  • continued from home page 15
  • Empire State Owners Go Ape Over IPO Tax Issues: Wall Street Journal April 8 2012
  • January 9, 2012 Answer to SEC inquiry
  • REITs Spring an Unnerving Surprise
  • Average Rent paid according to Malkin Holdings L.L.C.
  • Duties of Supervisor of Associates
  • Reuters: Empire State Building IPO change may help pay tax
  • Wall Street Journal: Tax Terms Amended in Empire State Building IPO
  • How to Ruin a Safe Bet; Did Rockefeller Center Financiers Reach Too Far?
  • May 31 2012 Helmsley Estate Driving Empire State Building IPO, Malkins Say
  • SEC May 11, 2012 :" "There are material risks and conflicts of interest associated with the consolidation."
  • Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. Lockup Agreement
  • Sublease or Lease
  • Shared Debt Obligation
  • Eliminating Two-Tier Ownership
  • Sublease renewals
  • June 9, 2008 Consent for Loan for Improvement Program
  • December 27, 1961 Lease Empire State Building Prudential Insurance Company and Empire State Building Associates
  • Lease renewals
  • June 8 2008 Loan for Improvements
  • June 9, 2008 Empire State Building Improvements Budget
  • $10 million REIT fees paid out 2011 Empire State Building IPO
  • 2011 Empire State Building Company LLC financials
  • SEC filing July 2, 2012 Empire State Building Associates L.L.C
  • ESBA number of participants
  • On August 6, 2012, Malkin Holdings L.L.C., the supervisor of Empire State Building Associates L.L.C. (the “Registrant”), provided the following to persons calling participants in the Registrant, to be used as a script for such calls:
  • SEC August 6, 2012 Empire State Realty Trust, Inc
  • Poll of ESBA participants
  • August 9, 2012 Legal Proceedings Empire State Building Associates 10Q
  • Columbia University Sublesse interest
  • August 9, 2012 SEC filing of New Risk Factor of More Lawsuits against Management
  • 2012: Observatory increased admission prices over 15%
  • Wells Notice
  • SEC Filing 8/24/12 "legally distinct from a joint venture"‏ malkin empire state sec filings
  • Empire State Realty Trust Empire State Realty Trust, Inc. Empire State Building IPO
  • Top ten reasons to Vote NO to sale of Empire State Building to REIT
  • Empire State Building Income
  • Page 1
  • Economic Joint Venture
  • 50/50 split
  • Empire State Building privately owned by Empire State Building Company?
  • S-4
  • 11/5/12 Settlement reached in Empire State Realty Trust suit
  • S-4 Red-lined version 11/2/12
  • Class Action Suit
  • Empire State Building Company Partnership Agreement
  • January 28, 2013 $800 Class Action Lawsuit Filed
  • REIT fees to ESBA investors
  • 1971 Sublessee Operating Agreement and Amendments
  • 1971 Empire State Building Company Participation Agreement
  • SEC 2/5/13 1971 Sublessee Empire State Building Company Participation Agreement
  • Top Ten Vote No
  • Sublease and improvements
  • Ex-Wien partner: Vote No to REIT
  • NYC's Towering TV Choice: 1 WTC Or Empire
  • Observatory
  • 1961 Empire State Building Associates Prospectus
  • A Yen for Yield Could Rock U.S. REIT
  • Law360
  • REfin Blog
  • Crain's New York: Bidders up ante at Empire State Bldg.
  • Crains New York: Another bidder moves to upset Empire St. Bldg. plan.
  • ESBA purchase of fee title 2001-2
  • Damage and Destruction:
  • ESBA land building cost percentages
  • Revman headed for Empire State Building
  • SL Green says private market will value ESB higher
  • Private market values exceed public market values
  • Thor makes second offer for Empire State Building
  • Empire State Building Investors Again Sue Owners Over IPO
  • Empire State Building Topless Model Lawsuit
  • Empire State Building $500 Million Lawsuit against Malkin Holdings
  • Investors Launch $600M Suit Over Empire State Building Deal
  • Law360: Report Details Malkin's Rebuff Of Empire State Bldg. Bids‏
  • Empire State Building Investor Appeals $55M Settlement
  • Empire State Building Investors Rip Owners Over Discovery
  • SEC Freedom of Information Act Exemptions
  • ESRT SEC filings comments and Malkin Holdings uploaded answers
  • ESRT SEC Indexed files
  • FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (FOIA) Annual Report for Fiscal Year 2013 (October 1, 2012 through September 30, 2013)
  • Freedom of Information Appeal (FOIA) Resources
  • “MALKIN FAMILY CONTRIBUTORS” to REIT
  • FOIA Vaughn Index
  • sec-glomar-response-to-foia-request-for-copies-of-interviews-with-empire-state-building-investors
  • “[WE] CAN NEITHER CONFIRM NOR DENY THE EXISTENCE OR NONEXISTENCE OF RECORDS RESPONSIVE TO YOUR REQUEST”1 : REFORMING THE GLOMAR RESPONSE UNDER FOIA
  • SEC issues Glomar Response for ESRT-first since 2010
  • Glomar Response-Office of Government Information Services
  • Empire State Building $600 Million lawsuit against Peter Malkin and Tony Malkin
  • SEC FOIA Lawsuit for Empire State Building REIT records
  • Case 1:14-cv-01140 EDELMAN v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Complaint
  • AGREEMENT BETWEEN MALKIN HOLDINGS LLC AND HELMSLEY ENTERPRISES, INC.
  • PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENTS and FORM OF PARTICIPATING AGREEMENT For Lincoln and Fish Buildings
  • Helmsley Management to self manage
  • SEC Division of Corporation Finance Staff Legal Bulletin No. 1 (with Addendum) "Confidential Treatment Requests"
  • Untitled
  • EDELMAN v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION-Case Assigned to Judge Rosemary M. Collyer. (md, )
  • About 20% of the people who were warned over a two-year period that they might be sued by U.S. regulators for allegedly violating securities law ended up not facing charges
  • justice.gov guide-freedom-information-act
  • September 19, 2013
  • September 5, 2013
  • August 12, 2013
  • December 21, 2012
  • December 17, 2012
  • October 19, 2012
  • October 10, 2012
  • October 5, 2012
  • September 24, 2012
  • September 13, 2012 file 1
  • September 13, 2012 file 2
  • September 10, 2012 file 1
  • September 10, 2012 file 2
  • September 5, 2012
  • August 27, 2012
  • May 8 , 2012
  • July 3, 2012
  • The OGIS Library Vaughn Index
  • FOIA Facts: Inside the Process of Preparing a Vaughn Index
  • Sample Vaughn Indexes
  • ESRT Equity Interests
  • SEC Vaughn Index Lawsuits
  • Gavin vs. SEC
  • GAVIN v. UNITED STATES SECURITIES EXCHANGE COMM., Civil No. 04-4522 (PAM/JSM). , at 4 (D. Minn. Oct. 13, 2006)
  • Empire State Realty Trust Ownership
  • Improvements ownership
  • Therefore, each of Associates and Lessee will ultimately bear one-half of the cost of the improvement program
  • CF Memo
  • SEC Is Steering More Trials to Judges It Appoints
  • 10/20/14 Activity in Case 1:14-cv-01140-RMC EDELMAN v. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Order
  • NYC Rooftop RF Options Widen
  • H.R.1211 - FOIA Act
  • Exemption 5
  • Exemption 6
  • 11/10/14 ESRT Update on Lawsuits
  • SEC: How Investigations Work
  • SEC FOIA Exclusions
  • SEC FOIA Requests November 2014
  • FOIA Glomar response conversion to The (c)(1) Exclusion
  • Law360: Empire State Building Investors Launch Another Suit Over IPO
  • 2/17/15: PLAINTIFF’S MEMORANDUM OF LAW IN OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF’S CROSS MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
  • ESB SEC FOIA Requests Updated List
  • ESB SEC FOIA Requests Updated List March 2015
  • 04/17/15 RICHARD EDELMAN, ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:14-CV-1140 (RDM) ) SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE ) COMMISSION, ) Defendant.
  • Malkin attorneys FOIA requests for ESB investigation files rebuffed by SEC
  • ESRT SEC Enforcement Investigation File
  • FOIA Lawsuit San Diego
  • Malkin Holdings lawyers Dewey Pegno SEC FOIA requests Empire State Building
  • Federal Court to Rule on release of SEC ESRT-Malkin Holdings Investigation Files
  • Peter Malkin Tony Malkin Lose Empire State Building Case Ruling
  • Malkin Holdings, Peter Malkin and Tony Malkin lose counterclaim ruling in Empire State Building Arbitration case.
  • Federal Court to rule on release of SEC ESRT Malkin Holdings ​Empire State Building investigation files.
  • SEC FOIA Lawsuit Empire State Realty Trust Malkin Holdings Consumer Complaints
  • Empire State Realty Trust Income Tax Treatment according to Malkin Holdings LLC
  • February 20, 2013 Re: In re Empire State Realty Trust, MNY-08894
  • SEC 662
  • SEC lawyers Empire State Building sale notes from calls and meetings with Malkin Holdings managers ordered released by Federal Judge
  • Malkin answer to SEC about unauthorized renewal of Empire State Building Master Lease
  • "SEC Ordered To Turn Over Empire State REIT Docs Index"
  • Empire State Building Department of Justice FOIA ruling Malkin Holdings


                     REITs Spring an Unnerving Surprise

                             Empire State Building Reit
                       Empire State Building Bidding Info:  click here
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052702303459004577364110318098188.html#mod%3DCommercial_1%26articleTabs%3Darticle 
By A.D. PRUITT And CRAIG KARMIN

During the decade leading up to the downturn, some small investors put their money into a special type of real-estate investment trust, ones that aren't traded on an exchange but promised steady dividends.

Now, as some of those REITs seek to go public and others face pressure from regulators to provide better disclosure on their value, investors are discovering the downsides: Some of the nontraded REITs are being valued at prices far lower than investors had expected.

This month, investors in Retail Properties of America Inc., one of the largest owners of strip malls and shopping centers in the U.S., learned that shares that were valued last June at $6.95 were valued during its initial public offering this month at $3.20, before a reverse stock split. The disclosure came as Retail Properties converted from a nontraded REIT to a publicly traded company on the New York Stock Exchange.

CoStar GroupKBS Real Estate Investment Trust 1Original price per share in 2006: $10 Current valuation: $5.16

Retail Properties declined to comment.

Also this year, Cornerstone Core Properties REIT Inc. disclosed in a regulatory filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission that its stock, which was sold to investors at $8 a share in 2008, actually is valued at $2.09. Until 2012, all Cornerstone noted in its regulatory filings was the initial offering price, without any updates.

Chief Executive Terry Roussel said in a shareholder letter last month that the value of the stock had to be reduced based on falling values of the industrial parks the REIT purchased at the height of the market. Cornerstone didn't respond to a request for comment.

Investors are expressing their displeasure partly by filing grievances against the investment advisers who sold them. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, or Finra, which oversees advisers, said it received 54% more complaints regarding nontraded REITs in 2011 than it did in 2009.

About 90 of these REITs were created mostly during the boom years, raising more than $73 billion, mostly from individual investors. Financial advisers have touted the prospect of profiting from real estate without the volatility of publicly traded REITs. They also have pointed to steady dividend payments of up to 7%, according to some financial advisers, investors and marketing material.

Until recently, most of these REITs performed as advertised. Dividend payments continued, and quarterly statements showed that the values of the REIT shares mostly stayed steady from the prices at which they were originally sold, even as the downturn clobbered the public REIT market.

But unlike publicly traded stocks, whose values are set in the marketplace, valuation methods for nontraded REITs have varied widely. Some companies look to outside appraisers or investment banks to assess current property values, while others rely on their own management, according to Kevin Gannon, a managing director at Robert A. Stanger & Co., a real-estate investment bank in Shrewsbury, N.J.

CoStar GroupCornerstone Core PropertiesOriginal price per share in 2008: $8Current valuation: $2.09

Last year, the SEC and Finra began cracking down. The SEC has talked to about six nontraded REITs "on providing better disclosures on their share valuations," said Michael McTiernan, a lawyer in the SEC's division of corporate finance. He said the agency is pressing companies to give better disclosure on such things as how shares are valued and any conflicts with third-party advisers.

Mr. McTiernan declined to identify the REITs, but said that once news of the SEC's efforts spread, "disclosure throughout the industry quickly improved."

Partly due to regulatory pressure, about 20 nontraded REITs are providing more information about how they arrived at their valuations, growth rates and other financial metrics useful to investors, said Mr. Gannon.

"A year ago none of them really provided the level of disclosure you're seeing today," he said.

Finra, meanwhile, also has been turning up the heat, proposing new rules that would set guidelines on financial-adviser disclosures on the REITs. Last year, Finra sued New York brokerage David Lerner Associates Inc., which sold funds, called Apple REITs, to small investors. Apple has no connection to the computer company.

Among Finra's charges, which still are pending: Lerner targeted unsophisticated and elderly investors with products that weren't suited to them. Lerner has described the Finra action as "rife with falsehoods."

To be sure, advocates of nontraded REITs said share prices could rise if conditions improve and property prices rise. Also, many nontraded REITs are responding to criticism by offering new REITs that report daily net asset values, have shorter life spans and make it easier for investors to redeem shares.

"We believe this is something that is long overdue," said Nicholas Schorsch, chief executive of American Realty Capital, which sponsors seven nontraded REITs.

Some investors, however, aren't happy with what they are hearing as nontraded REITs disclose more information.

Robert Block, a 74-year-old retiree living in Cape Coral, Fla., said he invested $412,000 in four nontraded REITs from 2006 to 2008 because his investment adviser told him the dividends were attractive and the REITs were "about as safe as anything you could get."

Initially, the share prices held steady as promised. But as of the first quarter of this year, his $400,000 investment was valued at about $300,000 based on REIT share valuations. "I needed income that I could count on and wasn't risky," he said. Mr. Block is seeking damages from his investment adviser in a Finra arbitration case.

Some nontraded REITs are adjusting valuations as part of the process for cashing out. Typically, when these investment vehicles were formed, investors were told that after seven to 10 years, the REIT would pay the capital back by selling all of its properties, merging with another company or becoming publicly traded.

Of the nontraded REITs launched since 1990, 19 have returned investors' capital, according to Blue Vault Partners LLC, a research firm in Cumming, Ga. Given that many nontraded REITs were established six or seven years ago, they will need to get properties in line with current market values when they sell the assets or take the companies public.

Write to Craig Karmin at craig.karmin@wsj.com